This year's top choice is actually something I wrote about previously for another format...
1992:
The trivia:
- Around seventy members of the French scouting group 'Éclaireuses et Éclaireurs de France ' descended on the Upper Mayriere Cave at the Bruniquel archaeological site with the best of intentions. Their plan was to remove the modern graffiti defacing the cave walls. Armed with wire brushes and enthusiasm, they set to work. Unfortunately, somewhere between scrubbing off the spray‑painted initials and feeling proud of their civic duty, the group got a little carried away. In the process of cleaning the walls, they managed to at least partially remove two prehistoric bison paintings - artworks that had survived for roughly 15,000 years before meeting their match in a troop of over‑zealous scouts. It was only after the damage was done that someone realised the “stubborn marks” weren’t modern vandalism at all, but priceless Palaeolithic art.
- In 1633, under threat of torture, the Roman Catholic Inquisition forced Galileo Galilei - one of the founders of modern science - to recant his belief that the Earth revolved around the Sun. Legend has it that after signing his recantation, Galileo muttered “E pur si muove” (“And yet it moves”). Fast‑forward 359 years. In 1992, Pope John Paul II finally declared that Galileo had been right all along. A satisfying conclusion, perhaps - except for the fact that it took the committee responsible more than a decade of research, meetings and theological chin‑stroking to reach this blindingly obvious verdict. You can almost picture them, poring over centuries‑old documents, weighing philosophical implications, and slowly, painstakingly arriving at the revolutionary conclusion that the Earth does indeed orbit the Sun. Still, better late than never. Even if “late” in this case means almost four centuries.
- When the container ship "Ever Laurel" hit a storm in the North Pacific in January of 1992, several large cargo containers were washed overboard. One of them burst open, releasing a consignment of 28,800 plastic bath toys — the now‑legendary “Friendly Floatees,” a cheerful menagerie of yellow ducks, red beavers, blue turtles and green frogs. Made of durable plastic and sealed watertight, they were never meant to survive the open ocean. And yet they did.. The Floatees drifted across the world’s currents like tiny, brightly coloured message bottles. Some travelled more than 17,000 miles. Others became trapped in Arctic ice for years before thawing out and continuing their journey. They washed up in Hawaii, Australia, Alaska, South America, and even as far afield as Ireland and the west coast of Scotland. A few were still being found more than a decade later, bleached by sun and salt but otherwise intact. These little toys became unintentional scientific instruments, helping researchers map the behaviour of ocean currents, gyres and long‑distance drift patterns. Somewhere out there, perhaps even now, a lone yellow duck may still be bobbing along, following the currents to its next unexpected shore...
The memory:
Virtual Murder
Back at the end of 2015, I wrote this post about the interesting journey which lead to me finally become a published writer - through an essay about the short-lived BBC series "Virtual Murder" appearing in the "You And Who Else" charity anthology about 50 years of British telefantasy. Now years later, I have reached the point in this series of look-back posts where the TV show was first transmitted, so it seems right that I should reproduce that essay here.
What you will read below is exactly the essay as it was published in "You And Who Else". I've made no attempt to improve or update things - just added a few pictures to break up the text.
------------------
Footfalls Echo In The Memory
Memory is what defines us. It makes us who we are as human beings. The man I am today has been shaped by the last 48 years of experiences. As much as I recall the morals and virtues instilled in me by my parents and the fun times I had as a child, I also recollect the harsh words from bullies at school or the rows with my ex-wife. They are all part of me.
Who I am now has also been heavily influenced by the television I watched. I have this reputation at work (from my participation in numerous pub quizzes) for being a repository for minor trivia about TV. It’s not really justified – it’s just that I can name all of the 'Fingerbobs' and sing the theme song to "Fraggle Rock" and tell you who played Will Scarlett in "Robin of Sherwood" – which my colleagues can’t. I think it’s because I have always tended to associate the different periods in my life with the SF and fantasy TV series of the times. A kind of tele-visual shorthand if you will – one informs the other and vice versa. As much as music or smells can be a mnemonic spark, fantastical TV (the odder the better) has been a trigger for me.
Ask me about being four or five years old and it will be as much about "Catweazle" or "Crystal Tipps and Alistair" as the birthday party I had or the holiday to the Isle of Wight. At ten my year was defined by "King of the Castle" and" Children of the Stones" – and something about a fancy dress street party for the Silver Jubilee. When I reflect on turning twenty in 1987, it’s "Star Cops" and "Max Headroom" that I think of. And through it all like a seam of gold in a layer of quartz is "Doctor Who".
In 1992 I was 25 years old, had been at work in a steady job for several years and lived in a shared house with two friends (although that was about to come to a messy end – we had bought the place together, what were we thinking?). The following year I would meet the woman who would become my first wife. But right then, I was still (marginally) more interested in fiction than reality.
Comics and "Doctor Who" have always been my twin passions, but the Timelord had been off of the TV screens for three years and I’d sadly drifted away from being a fan – even disposing of all my Target novelisations (what a terrible mistake that turned out to be). Apart from the sublime "Twin Peaks" a year earlier, there was a not a whole lot of genre TV out there at this time - this was pre the "X-File"s / "Babylon 5" explosion. I’d gravitated towards "Star Trek: The Next Generation" and "Quantum Leap" – transmitted in that famous BBC2 6.00pm slot – but although both were great programmes, they just weren’t “special” to me in the way that "Doctor Who" had been. Something was about to come along to change all that…
In a TV landscape somewhat dominated by fly-on-the-wall documentaries, "Virtual Murder" was an attempt by the BBC to break the pattern and go back to what it has always done best – original drama, this time with a SF / fantasy leaning. It was also to be for adults – transmitted at 9.30pm in the evening. So what would this new series be like? Take the 60’s camp oddness of "The Avengers" or "Department S". Add in a dash of Holmesian detective skills and genius intellect. Toss in a soupcon of the eccentricities of "Doctor Who". Stir well with a pinch of modern technological innovations. Voila! A recipe for success? Maybe.
The show concerned the adventures of the square jawed Dr John Cornelius (JC), a psychology lecturer, played by the late Nicholas Clay. Assisted by glamorous girlfriend Samantha Valentine (Kim Thompson), he helped the police in tracking down macabre criminals.
In my personal world, bereft of my favourite kind of quirky escapist drama, I seized it with both hands. This was the kind of thing I wanted to watch – not endless episodes of police on the beat or conference meetings on starships in a supposedly perfect future society! The cases the eccentric Doctor Cornelius investigated were as equally bizarre as the criminals. Paintings suddenly melting, a trail of bodies linked by strange knot clues, the brother of Santa Claus in a tale of two skeletons, a modern-day vampire, and deadly corporate espionage in a virtual environment. "Next Gen" couldn’t offer that kind of uniquely British nuttiness. The series had a knowing awareness of its own overblown unreality - and I loved it. It was the little show that tried to be something different.
I think I saw Cornelius as a kind of a proto-Timelord. Perhaps my Who fandom was trying to reassert itself? I could almost imagine a future incarnation of the Doctor being exiled to Earth like his predecessor and setting up in a university as a consultant psychologist / detective. Except this regeneration had a full romantic relationship with his “assistant”! There were already hints of both Baker’s in Nicholas Clay’s performance, so it wasn’t too much of a stretch. I’d always identified with the Doctor as the odd-one-out (which was exactly how I had felt during my formative years). With Who off the air, perhaps I latched onto JC as a role model. Being intelligent and well read *could* get you the girl. I’m not ashamed to say that I was still trying to “find” myself, even at 25.
Whatever the underlying reasons, every Friday night I would be sitting there watching - enjoying the banter between JC and Samantha, the skulduggery of the villains and the sheer style, fun and inventiveness on display. I tried talking about it with friends and family and work colleagues, but while those that weren’t down the pub on a Friday night enjoyed it well enough, they just didn’t seem to “get” it to quite the extent I did. In a way I liked that. "Virtual Murder" had become “my” show. Arguments had started between my friends and I, and despite living in the same house we weren’t socialising together anymore. I really felt quite unhappy and trapped in a situation of my own making, so I retreated into the things that gave me the most pleasure. Comic books and this strange serial had become my escape.
Even with all the Doctor-ish qualities I was probably projecting onto the programme, it was genuinely a who's-who of Who both in front of and behind the camera. Bernard Bresslaw, Philip Martin, Richard Todd, Bernard Horsfall, Peggy Mount - the list went on. Best of all, episode four had Jon Pertwee as Luis Silverado, a retired brothel keeper (and chef). Pertwee quite obviously had a ball in the role – dodgy Spanish accent, twirling Mario-like grey moustache and pyromaniacal tendencies. It was "Doctor Who" seen through Star Trek's mirror universe. His character died all too soon, and the episode is the poorer for it, but his brief appearance was fantastic.
There were a plethora of other well known guest artistes too. Hywel Bennett was cast against type for the first time as a villain. Plus Ronald Fraser, Tessa Wyatt, Sean Pertwee, Tony Robinson, Jill Gascoine – Julian Clary as an undertaker even – bulked out an impressive cast list for a serial lasting only a few short weeks. The BBC had put a lot of effort into this.
Looking back now, "Virtual Murder" might also have contained the seed of a lot of elements in popular BBC detective series to come. Is there the kernel of the central relationship between Jonathan Creek and Maddie Magellan in the sparky rapport between JC and Samantha? Maybe a glint of the modern day Sherlock, twenty years before Steven Moffat’s triumphant reboot? Yes, I think about the show that much, even all this time later.
Sadly it wasn’t to last. Six weeks of madness and magic and then it was gone. John Cornelius disappeared off into the sunset, never to be seen by anyone ever again. You see, the real crime JC and Samantha should investigate is why "Virtual Murder" wasn’t an instant gigantic success – and more importantly why is it that this wonderful offbeat set of six episodes has never been repeated on TV or released on any version of home media. The only reason I still have copies to watch now is because I luckily captured them on VHS at the time. The tapes are long gone (victim of a move to a smaller house) but I still have the digital copies I made. Okay, by today’s standards it’s moderately dated in that 1990’s ‘over the top staging / everything’s on videotape / someone’s discovered the funky scene transition effects button’ kind of way, but I didn’t care then and I don’t care now.
What is even worse though is that as marvellous as it was, it seems I’m one of only a handful of people who even remember it existed at all. Go on - do an internet search for Virtual Murder. I’ll wait here for you…
See? Excluding the obvious sites like Wikipedia and IMDB, there are less than half a dozen entries. Even something as obscure as 1977’s American SF sitcom “Quark” has more pages devoted to it and a DVD release. Virtual Murder has been consigned to oblivion – and that’s a damn shame. *
I mentioned earlier that I link TV shows with memories of specific times in my life. Virtual Murder is lodged in there deep and will always bring to mind a transitional and rather difficult period – after becoming independent from my parents, but before the highs (and lows) of what was to become a serious long term relationship. Maybe the rest of the world has forgotten about this odd and unique drama, but me? - I will continue to remember it with great affection.
------------------
* Obviously the internet has moved on in the years since I originally wrote this, and many more people have written nostalgia-tinged pieces about the show. You can even find the whole series on You Tube !
* Obviously the internet has moved on in the years since I originally wrote this, and many more people have written nostalgia-tinged pieces about the show. You can even find the whole series on You Tube !
Honourable mentions:
- The Muppet Christmas Carol - For my money, the best version of the Dickens’ classic ever put on screen - and I say that as someone who loves almost every adaptation out there. It was the first Muppet movie made after the death of legendary creator Jim Henson, and there’s something deeply moving about how beautifully it carries his spirit forward. The masterstroke, of course, was casting Michael Caine as Scrooge and having him play it completely straight. No winks, no mugging - just a full‑blooded dramatic performance dropped into a world of felt and fur. It grounds the entire film. Around him, the Muppets are perfectly chosen for their roles - Kermit as Bob Cratchit, Gonzo as Dickens himself, even Statler and Waldorf heckling from beyond the grave as Marley and Marley. It all fits with such effortless precision that you can’t imagine it any other way. And then there are Paul Williams’ songs - incredibly catchy, heartfelt, and perfectly tuned to the story. Watching this movie has become a Christmas tradition in our household. My kids grew up with it as their favourite film. It’s funny, it’s tender, it’s beautifully made, and it captures the heart of Dickens’ story with more sincerity than most “serious” adaptations ever manage. A perfect Christmas film - and a perfect Muppet film.
- Savage Dragon - Created by Erik Larsen, one of the original Image Comics founders, this is one of only two titles that has been in continuous publication since the company started. Larsen has written, drawn (and in many cases coloured and lettered) the main strip for every single issue over a period of more than thirty years. In an industry built on rotating creative teams and constant relaunches, that level of commitment borders on the insane. But the achievement isn’t just the longevity - it’s the way Larsen uses it. "Savage Dragon" unfolds in real time. Characters grow up, age, change careers, fall in love, have children, die, and get replaced by the next generation. The book’s world evolves with the same messy unpredictability as real life, which gives it a weight and emotional continuity that most superhero comics never even attempt. The original Dragon was a green skinned fin-headed powerhouse with vast strength and a remarkable healing factor - a classic Kirby‑esque character. He anchored the series for the first 192 issues. And then, in a move almost unthinkable for a mainstream superhero book, Dragon died and the series passed to his son, Malcolm. He has slightly different powers including the ability to generate electrical charges. And now *he* has kids and the book is shifting towards adventures with a whole family of Dragons. What keeps me reading, long after I’ve dropped every other monthly title, is Larsen’s willingness to experiment. He’ll try anything - wild tonal shifts (like turning the book into an adult sex comedy), huge cast shake‑ups, bizarre new villains, sudden deaths, unexpected romances - all with his trademark kinetic artwork that feels like it’s constantly trying to burst off the page. A one‑man epic that has grown and changed alongside its creator - and in a landscape of endless reboots and safe bets, that makes it something genuinely special.
- Tori Amos - Little Earthquakes - In a year that (unfortunately) gave us Right Said Fred and Billy Ray Cyrus, the real standout was the debut album from Tori Amos. It arrived like a lightning bolt - intimate, poetic and challenging - shades of the quirky, experimental spirit I loved in Kate Bush, but filtered through a distinctly American sensibility. The first time I heard it, I knew this wasn’t just another singer‑songwriter. The lyrics were raw, confessional, sometimes painfully direct, sometimes dreamlike and oblique. I was instantly smitten. I played the whole record constantly, letting it seep into my bones, and found myself completely immersed in Tori’s strange, beautiful world - one I’ve never tired of, even after multiple albums and decades of listening. There are so many standout tracks. "Me and a Gun" remains one of the most raw pieces of music ever recorded - a stark, unaccompanied account of trauma that still stops me in my tracks. "China" is a quiet lament for a love slipping away, full of tenderness and regret. But if I have to choose a favourite, it’s "Winter", Tori’s song about her relationship with her minister father. It’s gentle, aching, and even now, it hits with the same emotional force it had the first time I heard it. "Little Earthquakes" was the beginning of a lifelong connection with a wonderful artist - one who still continues to surprise and move me right up to the present day.
- Toys - One of those films that instantly divides a room. Ambitious, surreal, visually extravagant and utterly uninterested in behaving like a normal studio movie, it’s the very definition of “love it or loathe it” - and I’m sure you can guess which side of the fence I fall on. The story begins with the death of toymaker Kenneth Zevo, whose company is unexpectedly left not to his whimsical children Leslie and Alsatia (Robin Williams and Joan Cusack), but to his war‑obsessed brother Leland, played with icy precision by Michael Gambon. Almost overnight, the factory transforms from a pastel‑coloured wonderland into a militarised complex churning out war toys, drones and weaponised playthings. Leslie, who has spent his life drifting through the company’s dreamlike corridors, suddenly finds himself fighting for his family’s legacy. Beneath all the surrealism lies a surprisingly serious message about the militarisation of entertainment and the erosion of innocence. It’s a cautionary fable wrapped in bright paper, which is probably why so many people didn’t know what to make of it. What makes "Toys" so special though is the sheer amount of visual imagination on display. Barry Levinson directs it like a pop‑art fever dream - vast toy‑box sets, impossible architecture, candy‑coloured landscapes and camera work that feels slightly off‑kilter in the best possible way. The performances match the tone perfectly, leaning into the film's heightened reality. It also helps that the soundtrack is fantastic - Grace Jones, Thomas Dolby, and even a contribution from a certain Tori Amos. It isn’t perfect, but it’s bold, imaginative and utterly unique. And honestly, that’s far more interesting




















